<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mind Swatches (BLOG)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on ProcessForm/NateMail 4? by Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Hi Nate -

I love your script and have been using it a couple of years. The only enhancement I'd like to see is customized error pages. I'd love to be able to apply simple customization as we're able to do with the confirmation page. That's it! Can't wait to see the update.

Thanks again, Nate!

Dawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nate -</p>
<p>I love your script and have been using it a couple of years. The only enhancement I&#8217;d like to see is customized error pages. I&#8217;d love to be able to apply simple customization as we&#8217;re able to do with the confirmation page. That&#8217;s it! Can&#8217;t wait to see the update.</p>
<p>Thanks again, Nate!</p>
<p>Dawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GoLive 9 and Dreamweaver CS3 by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/swatches/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Hello Chris. No, up until version CS2, GoLive was Adobe's pro-level web authoring application (so, comparable to Dreamweaver, but different manufacturer). After Adobe bought Macromedia and acquired Dreamweaver, GoLive 9 was demoted to the "entry level" web application and is now, IMO, inferior to Dreamweaver CS3 for pro use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Chris. No, up until version CS2, GoLive was Adobe&#8217;s pro-level web authoring application (so, comparable to Dreamweaver, but different manufacturer). After Adobe bought Macromedia and acquired Dreamweaver, GoLive 9 was demoted to the &#8220;entry level&#8221; web application and is now, IMO, inferior to Dreamweaver CS3 for pro use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GoLive 9 and Dreamweaver CS3 by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/swatches/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>I learned how to do web design with dreamweaver and it's a fantastic programme once you get to use it. I've not used GoLive, is it just a more simplier version of dreamweaver? 

Would you say that Dreamweaver is the broader, more professional web design tool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned how to do web design with dreamweaver and it&#8217;s a fantastic programme once you get to use it. I&#8217;ve not used GoLive, is it just a more simplier version of dreamweaver? </p>
<p>Would you say that Dreamweaver is the broader, more professional web design tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flex Builder 3 by Nate Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2008-02-25/flex-builder-3/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2008-02-25/flex-builder-3/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Also updated: Adobe Developer Connection (ADC) website:
http://developer.adobe.com/

Reported Changes:
1) Better navigation just for developers
2) The ADC content has returned to the center of the page
3) Search UI and functionality enhanced.
4) Enhancements to existing ADC membership benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also updated: Adobe Developer Connection (ADC) website:<br />
<a href="http://developer.adobe.com/" rel="nofollow">http://developer.adobe.com/</a></p>
<p>Reported Changes:<br />
1) Better navigation just for developers<br />
2) The ADC content has returned to the center of the page<br />
3) Search UI and functionality enhanced.<br />
4) Enhancements to existing ADC membership benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GoLive 9 and Dreamweaver CS3 by Mind Swatches (BLOG) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GoLive 9 Extension: DeforceCSS</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Mind Swatches (BLOG) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GoLive 9 Extension: DeforceCSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/swatches/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] my first blog post on this site, I posted a review of GoLive 9 and my intentions for moving future development to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my first blog post on this site, I posted a review of GoLive 9 and my intentions for moving future development to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GoLive 9 and Dreamweaver CS3 by Nate Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/swatches/2007-09-25/golive-cs3/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Update - I still haven't gotten around to trying it, but there's a new (currently free) 3rd party extension to disable what I'd consider the most troubling behavior in GoLive 9 - the auto-generated CSS. For now, the extension can be downloaded here: http://golive.werk01.de/DeforceCSS/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update - I still haven&#8217;t gotten around to trying it, but there&#8217;s a new (currently free) 3rd party extension to disable what I&#8217;d consider the most troubling behavior in GoLive 9 - the auto-generated CSS. For now, the extension can be downloaded here: <a href="http://golive.werk01.de/DeforceCSS/" rel="nofollow">http://golive.werk01.de/DeforceCSS/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Video Training by music</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-11-06/lyndacom-online-training/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-11-06/lyndacom-online-training/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>very interesting. 
i'm adding in RSS Reader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting.<br />
i&#8217;m adding in RSS Reader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ProcessForm/NateMail 4? by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hi Al - most likely, the spammer isn't using your for (assuming that's where you have the maxlength set for the field). It's much easier for them to make their own form and submit directly to the script (spoofing the referrer headers), which would by-pass any protections you've put in the form page. To force entries to at least go through your form initially (and eliminate most bot-submitted spam), you'd need a security confirmation image, like this one:
http://www.mindpalette.com/tutorials/captcha

Otherwise, might want to take this to the support forum:
http://www.mindpalette.com/forum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Al - most likely, the spammer isn&#8217;t using your for (assuming that&#8217;s where you have the maxlength set for the field). It&#8217;s much easier for them to make their own form and submit directly to the script (spoofing the referrer headers), which would by-pass any protections you&#8217;ve put in the form page. To force entries to at least go through your form initially (and eliminate most bot-submitted spam), you&#8217;d need a security confirmation image, like this one:<br />
<a href="http://www.mindpalette.com/tutorials/captcha" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindpalette.com/tutorials/captcha</a></p>
<p>Otherwise, might want to take this to the support forum:<br />
<a href="http://www.mindpalette.com/forum" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindpalette.com/forum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ProcessForm/NateMail 4? by Al Guevara</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Guevara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 07:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hi Nate
Possible exploit found  on your ProcessForm. 

Nate, one of my processforms seems to be exploited, somehow spammers are defeating the maxlenght="" and submitting as much as they want even though I have it set to a fixed amount and under 30.

Im saving said email responses when I discovered this, and will let you do whatever you need, login, etc) to get at this exploit.
 

Hope to see you back soon.

Al Guevara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nate<br />
Possible exploit found  on your ProcessForm. </p>
<p>Nate, one of my processforms seems to be exploited, somehow spammers are defeating the maxlenght=&#8221;" and submitting as much as they want even though I have it set to a fixed amount and under 30.</p>
<p>Im saving said email responses when I discovered this, and will let you do whatever you need, login, etc) to get at this exploit.</p>
<p>Hope to see you back soon.</p>
<p>Al Guevara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ProcessForm/NateMail 4? by Al Guevara</title>
		<link>http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Guevara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindpalette.com/blog/2007-10-26/processformnatemail-4/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Multiple page forms (for   L  O  N  G   forms)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiple page forms (for   L  O  N  G   forms)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
